Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.090
Filtrar
1.
ACS Nano ; 18(12): 8733-8744, 2024 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469811

RESUMO

Covalent conjugation of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) is frequently employed to enhance the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of various protein and nanoparticle therapeutics. Unfortunately, some PEGylated drugs can induce elevated levels of antibodies that can bind PEG, i.e., anti-PEG antibodies (APA), in some patients. APA in turn can reduce the efficacy and increase the risks of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. There is currently no intervention available in the clinic that specifically mitigates allergic reactions to PEGylated drugs without the use of broad immunosuppression. We previously showed that infusion of high molecular weight free PEG could safely and effectively suppress the induction of APA in mice and restore prolonged circulation of various PEGylated therapeutics. Here, we explored the effectiveness of free PEG as a prophylaxis against anaphylaxis induced by PEG-specific allergic reactions in swine. Injection of PEG-liposomes (PL) resulted in anaphylactoid shock (pseudoanaphylaxis) within 1-3 min in both naïve and PL-sensitized swine. In contrast, repeated injection of free PEG alone did not result in allergic reactions, and injection of free PEG effectively suppressed allergic reactions to PL, including in previously PL-sensitized swine. These results strongly support the further investigation of free PEG for reducing APA and allergic responses to PEGylated therapeutics.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Humanos , Animais , Suínos , Camundongos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Distribuição Tecidual , Nanomedicina , Polietilenoglicóis/farmacologia , Anticorpos/metabolismo , Lipossomos/farmacologia
2.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 24(3): 153-159, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538146

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food allergy is a growing health problem that affects both patients and society in multiple ways. Despite the emergence of novel diagnostic tools, such as component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) and basophil activation tests (BAT), oral food challenge (OFC) still plays an indispensable role in the management of food allergies. This review aimed to highlight the indications and safety concerns of conducting an OFC and to provide insights into post-OFC management based on recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Standardized OFC protocols have regional diversification, especially in Japan and Western countries. Recent studies suggested that the interval between doses should be at least more than an hour. Furthermore, applying a stepwise method tailored to the patient's specific immunoglobulin E level and history of anaphylaxis seems to mitigate these risks. Recent surveys have shown that, following a positive OFC, options other than strict avoidance are also selected. SUMMARY: OFC serves diverse purposes, yet the risks it carries warrant caution. The stepwise protocol appears promising for its safety. Subthreshold consumption following OFC shows potential; however, further research on its efficacy and safety is required. Management following OFC should be tailored and well discussed between clinicians and patients.


Assuntos
Alérgenos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Administração Oral , Alérgenos/imunologia , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/terapia , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Alimentos/efeitos adversos
3.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 52(2): 32-44, mar. 2024. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-231093

RESUMO

The incidence of food allergies has risen around the globe, and experts have been exploring methods of preventing such allergies in young children to ease the burden of disease and reduce the morbidity and mortality caused by anaphylaxis to food allergens. Such preventative measures can be categorised as primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, which are discussed in detail in this review. Primary prevention is defined as the prevention of becoming sensitised towards specific allergens. The evidence suggests that avoiding common allergenic foods during pregnancy and breastfeeding is not protective against food allergies, and guidelines recommend weaning from 4 to 6 months of age, with recent studies supporting the early introduction of peanuts at 4 months to prevent peanut allergy. Secondary prevention targets patients who are already sensitised and aims to halt the progression of sensitisation, with evidence for high rates of success and safety in trials of early introduction to milk and peanuts using oral immunotherapy in sensitised infants. Tertiary allergy prevention focuses on reducing the risk of a patient having anaphylaxis, with oral immunotherapy being the most common method of promoting tolerance in allergic children. Several studies have demonstrated successful reintroduction for milk, egg and peanut; however, no such guidelines are recommended for other foods. Finally, dietary advancement therapy in the form of milk and egg ladders has been employed as a method of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of allergies, particularly in Ireland, the UK and Canada.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Prevenção Primária , Prevenção Secundária , Prevenção Terciária , Incidência , Anafilaxia/mortalidade , Alergia e Imunologia , Hipersensibilidade , Pediatria , Prevenção de Doenças , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle
4.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(2): 32-44, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459888

RESUMO

The incidence of food allergies has risen around the globe, and experts have been exploring methods of preventing such allergies in young children to ease the burden of disease and reduce the morbidity and mortality caused by anaphylaxis to food allergens. Such preventative measures can be categorised as primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, which are discussed in detail in this review. Primary prevention is defined as the prevention of becoming sensitised towards specific allergens. The evidence suggests that avoiding common allergenic foods during pregnancy and breastfeeding is not protective against food allergies, and guidelines recommend weaning from 4 to 6 months of age, with recent studies supporting the early introduction of peanuts at 4 months to prevent peanut allergy. Secondary prevention targets patients who are already sensitised and aims to halt the progression of sensitisation, with evidence for high rates of success and safety in trials of early introduction to milk and peanuts using oral immunotherapy in sensitised infants. Tertiary allergy prevention focuses on reducing the risk of a patient having anaphylaxis, with oral immunotherapy being the most common method of promoting tolerance in allergic children. Several studies have demonstrated successful reintroduction for milk, egg and peanut; however, no such guidelines are recommended for other foods. Finally, dietary advancement therapy in the form of milk and egg ladders has been employed as a method of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of allergies, particularly in Ireland, the UK and Canada.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Lactente , Criança , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Terciária , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Aleitamento Materno , Dieta/métodos , Alérgenos , Arachis
5.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1299484, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380329

RESUMO

Introduction: Peanut allergy is an immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated food allergy. Rubia cordifolia L. (R. cordifolia), a Chinese herbal medicine, protects against peanut-induced anaphylaxis by suppressing IgE production in vivo. This study aims to identify IgE-inhibitory compounds from the water extract of R. cordifolia and investigate the underlying mechanisms using in vitro and in vivo models. Methods: Compounds were isolated from R. cordifolia water extract and their bioactivity on IgE production was assessed using a human myeloma U266 cell line. The purified active compound, xanthopurpurin (XPP), was identified by LC-MS and NMR. Peanut-allergic C3H/HeJ mice were orally administered with or without XPP at 200µg or 400µg per mouse per day for 4 weeks. Serum peanut-specific IgE levels, symptom scores, body temperatures, and plasma histamine levels were measured at challenge. Cytokines in splenocyte cultures were determined by ELISA, and IgE + B cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Acute and sub-chronic toxicity were evaluated. IL-4 promoter DNA methylation, RNA-Seq, and qPCR analysis were performed to determine the regulatory mechanisms of XPP. Results: XPP significantly and dose-dependently suppressed the IgE production in U266 cells. XPP significantly reduced peanut-specific IgE (>80%, p <0.01), and plasma histamine levels and protected the mice against peanut-allergic reactions in both early and late treatment experiments (p < 0.05, n=9). XPP showed a strong protective effect even 5 weeks after discontinuing the treatment. XPP significantly reduced the IL-4 level without affecting IgG or IgA and IFN-γ production. Flow cytometry data showed that XPP reduced peripheral and bone marrow IgE + B cells compared to the untreated group. XPP increased IL-4 promoter methylation. RNA-Seq and RT-PCR experiments revealed that XPP regulated the gene expression of CCND1, DUSP4, SDC1, ETS1, PTPRC, and IL6R, which are related to plasma cell IgE production. All safety testing results were in the normal range. Conclusions: XPP successfully protected peanut-allergic mice against peanut anaphylaxis by suppressing IgE production. XPP suppresses murine IgE-producing B cell numbers and inhibits IgE production and associated genes in human plasma cells. XPP may be a potential therapy for IgE-mediated food allergy.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim , Camundongos , Humanos , Animais , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/terapia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Histamina , Interleucina-4 , Medula Óssea , Camundongos Endogâmicos C3H , Imunoglobulina E , Água
6.
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol ; 42(1): 1-13, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165149

RESUMO

Fish allergy is one of the "big nine" categories of food allergens worldwide, and its prevalence is increasing with the higher demand for this nutritious food source. Fish allergies are a significant health concern as it is a leading cause of food anaphylaxis, accounting for 9% of all deaths from anaphylaxis. The gaps in treating fish allergies at present are the incomplete identification of fish allergens, lack of component-resolved diagnosis of fish allergens in the clinical setting, and the variability in sensitization profiles based on different fish consumption practices. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) improves tolerance towards accidental consumption of fish and is longer lasting than pharmacotherapy. Current practice or research of fish AIT ranges from the use of whole fish via oral desensitization, to the use of purified recombinant parvalbumin and its hypoallergenic variant, passive IgG immunization, and modifying the allergenicity of parvalbumin by changing the diet of farmed fish. However, the focus of fish allergen-based studies in the context of AIT has been restricted to parvalbumins. More research is required to understand the involvement of other fish allergens, and several other strategies of AIT including peptide vaccines, DNA vaccines, hybrid allergens, and the use of nanobodies that have the capacity to treat multiple allergens have been proposed. For AIT, other important aspects to consider are the route of desensitization, and the biomarkers to assess the success of immunotherapy. Finally, we also address several clinical considerations for fish AIT.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Animais , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Parvalbuminas/genética , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Alérgenos
8.
J Clin Anesth ; 94: 111377, 2024 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241788

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of cefazolin perioperative anaphylaxis (POA) in patients with and without a penicillin allergy label (PAL) to determine whether the prevalence of cefazolin POA differs based on the presence of a PAL. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: A large U.S. healthcare system in the Baltimore-D.C. region, July 2017 to July 2020. PATIENTS: 112,817 surgical encounters across inpatient and outpatient settings in various specialties, involving 90,089 patients. Of these, 4876 (4.3%) encounters had a PAL. INTERVENTIONS: Perioperative cefazolin administration within 4 h before surgery to 4 h after the procedure began. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was cefazolin POA in patients with and without PALs. Potential POA cases were identified based on tryptase orders or diphenhydramine administrations within the initial cefazolin administration to 6 h postoperatively. Verification included two validation steps. The first checked for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) documentation, and the second, led by Allergy specialists, identified POA and the probable culprit. The secondary outcome looked at cefazolin use trends in patients with a PAL, stratified by setting and specialty. MAIN RESULTS: Of 112,817 encounters, 1421 (1.3%) had possible cefazolin HSRs. Of these, 22 (1.5%) had POA, resulting in a 0.02% prevalence. Of these, 13 (59.1%) were linked to cefazolin and 9 (40.9%) attributed to other drugs. Only one cefazolin POA case had a PAL, indicating no significant difference in cefazolin POA prevalence between patients with and without PALs (p = 0.437). Perioperative cefazolin use in patients with PALs steadily increased from 2.6% to 6.0% between 2017 and 2020, specifically in academic settings. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of cefazolin POA does not exhibit significant differences between patients with and without PALs, and notably, the incidence remains remarkably low. Based on these findings, it is advisable to view cefazolin as an acceptable choice for prophylaxis in patients carrying a PAL.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Humanos , Cefazolina/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos
9.
Nursing ; 54(2): 33-35, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38271128

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: In the US, sesame was recognized as the ninth major food allergen in 2021, underscoring the importance of updated allergen labeling to facilitate effective prevention plans and anaphylaxis response. This article discusses the prevalence of sesame seed allergy among children in the US and outlines strategies for nurses to understand the assessment, treatment, and education of patients regarding this allergen.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Sesamum , Criança , Humanos , Sesamum/efeitos adversos , Sementes/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Alérgenos
10.
Mol Biotechnol ; 66(1): 26-33, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36988875

RESUMO

The occurrence of allergy, a type I hypersensitivity reaction, is rising exponentially all over the world. Sometimes, allergy proves to be fatal for atopic patients, due to the occurrence of anaphylaxis. This study is aimed to find an anti-allergic agent that can inhibit the binding of IgE to Human High Affinity IgE Receptor (FCεRI), thereby preventing the degranulation of mast cells. A considerable number of potential anti-allergic compounds were assessed for their inhibitory strength through ADMET studies. AUTODOCK was used for estimating the binding energy between anti-allergic compounds and FCεRI, along with the interacting amino acids. The docked pose showing favorable binding energy was subjected to molecular dynamics simulation study. Marrubiin, a diterpenoid lactone from Lamiaceae, and epicatechin-3-gallate appears to be effective in blocking the Human High Affinity IgE Receptor (FCεRI). This in-silico study proposes the use of marrubiin and epicatechin-3-gallate, in the downregulation of allergic responses. Due to the better inhibition constant, future direction of this study is to analyze the safety and efficacy of marrubiin in anti-allergic activities through in-vivo clinical human trials.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Antialérgicos , Diterpenos , Hipersensibilidade , Humanos , Antialérgicos/farmacologia , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Receptores de IgE/química , Receptores de IgE/metabolismo , Receptores de IgE/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina E/química , Imunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Imunoglobulina E/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Hipersensibilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade/metabolismo , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle
11.
Cell Rep Med ; 5(1): 101346, 2024 01 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38128531

RESUMO

The only FDA-approved oral immunotherapy for a food allergy provides protection against accidental exposure to peanuts. However, this therapy often causes discomfort or side effects and requires long-term commitment. Better preventive and therapeutic solutions are urgently needed. We develop a tolerance-inducing vaccine technology that utilizes glycosylation-modified antigens to induce antigen-specific non-responsiveness. The glycosylation-modified antigens are administered intravenously (i.v.) or subcutaneously (s.c.) and traffic to the liver or lymph nodes, respectively, leading to preferential internalization by antigen-presenting cells, educating the immune system to respond in an innocuous way. In a mouse model of cow's milk allergy, treatment with glycosylation-modified ß-lactoglobulin (BLG) is effective in preventing the onset of allergy. In addition, s.c. administration of glycosylation-modified BLG shows superior safety and potential in treating existing allergies in combination with anti-CD20 co-therapy. This platform provides an antigen-specific immunomodulatory strategy to prevent and treat food allergies.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Hipersensibilidade a Leite , Vacinas , Camundongos , Animais , Feminino , Bovinos , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Glicosilação , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/prevenção & controle , Lactoglobulinas/metabolismo
12.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 132(2): 124-176, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38108678

RESUMO

This practice parameter update focuses on 7 areas in which there are new evidence and new recommendations. Diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis have been revised, and patterns of anaphylaxis are defined. Measurement of serum tryptase is important for diagnosis of anaphylaxis and to identify underlying mast cell disorders. In infants and toddlers, age-specific symptoms may differ from older children and adults, patient age is not correlated with reaction severity, and anaphylaxis is unlikely to be the initial reaction to an allergen on first exposure. Different community settings for anaphylaxis require specific measures for prevention and treatment of anaphylaxis. Optimal prescribing and use of epinephrine autoinjector devices require specific counseling and training of patients and caregivers, including when and how to administer the epinephrine autoinjector and whether and when to call 911. If epinephrine is used promptly, immediate activation of emergency medical services may not be required if the patient experiences a prompt, complete, and durable response. For most medical indications, the risk of stopping or changing beta-blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor medication may exceed the risk of more severe anaphylaxis if the medication is continued, especially in patients with insect sting anaphylaxis. Evaluation for mastocytosis, including a bone marrow biopsy, should be considered for adult patients with severe insect sting anaphylaxis or recurrent idiopathic anaphylaxis. After perioperative anaphylaxis, repeat anesthesia may proceed in the context of shared decision-making and based on the history and results of diagnostic evaluation with skin tests or in vitro tests when available, and supervised challenge when necessary.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos , Mastocitose , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/tratamento farmacológico , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Mastocitose/diagnóstico , Alérgenos
13.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 23(6): 514-519, 2023 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37846900

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review discusses allergen immunotherapy (AIT) safety in children. RECENT FINDINGS: AIT is a well tolerated and effective treatment for pediatric allergic conditions. While mostly well tolerated, severe reactions and near fatal reactions may occur with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) once in every 160 000 visits. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is associated more with local side effects, but severe systemic reactions, including anaphylaxis, have been rarely reported. Providing informed consent, recognizing risk factors for severe systemic reactions, such as severe or uncontrolled asthma, and mitigating the risk of severe reactions are important components to improving the safety of AIT. SUMMARY: Overall, AIT is well tolerated in children, and data suggest that the incidence of systemic reactions in children receiving SCIT is no less than mixed populations of adult and pediatric patients. SLIT carries less risk for systemic reactions, and local oral site-application reactions are usually mild and resolve within 15 days of treatment.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Asma , Rinite Alérgica , Imunoterapia Sublingual , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Asma/terapia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Injeções Subcutâneas , Alérgenos , Rinite Alérgica/terapia
14.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21(11): 1308-1313, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37723909

RESUMO

A vegan diet is increasingly en vogue, i.e., a diet based on plants, in which animal products are completely avoided, often for health and environmental reasons. The menu is supplemented with pulses (e.g., soy, lentils, peas), nuts (e.g., cashew, macadamia, almond, pecan, para, walnut) and seeds (e.g., chia, flaxseed) or pseudo-grains (quinoa, buckwheat). Indeed, the product range is expanding to include vegan foods such as milk alternatives (e.g., oat, almond, soy drinks) and cheese or meat substitutes (e.g., soy-based). Food allergies are also on the rise, with an increasing prevalence worldwide. It is worthy of note that the main allergens of anaphylactic reactions to food in adults are predominantly of plant origin, mainly pulses and nuts - the very foods that form the main source of protein in the vegan diet. In this context, allergies to storage proteins (e.g., Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 from soya beans) can lead to severe anaphylactic reactions, while highly processed substitute products containing plant protein isolates (e.g., pea flour) in concentrated form continue to be of particular concern and may therefore be allergologically problematic. In this article, we aim to provide an overview of allergens and emerging allergen sources in vegan foods and highlight the anaphylaxis risk of the vegan diet.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Animais , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dieta Vegana/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia
16.
Transfusion ; 63(9): 1685-1691, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37587736

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) iron carries risks of mild, self-limiting, tryptase-negative Fishbane and complement activation-related pseudo-allergy reactions, with rare reports of anaphylaxis. Historically, high-molecular-weight iron dextran (HMWID) was associated with a higher incidence of anaphylaxis and empiric premedication with antihistamines/corticosteroids have been used to mitigate this risk. HMWID is no longer available and the risk of hypersensitivity reactions with newer IV iron formulations is low. Therefore, the use of routine prophylactic premedication in all patients is not justified but should be considered in high-risk patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our primary aim was to reduce inappropriate premedication before IV iron administration by 50% so that our institution's hematology providers only prescribe premedications to patients at high risk of having a severe reaction. Interventions included a multidisciplinary education initiative to highlight current evidence against universal administration of premedications and revision of the IV iron informed consent form and electronic order set. RESULTS: We measured the success of our intervention by comparing data collected during a 6-month pre-intervention period (837 infusions) to a 6-month post-intervention period (947 infusions). Inappropriate administration of premedications decreased from 79% in the pre-intervention period compared to 65% in the post-intervention period. We found no significant difference in the number of Fishbane reactions, severe reactions, and emergency room admissions, despite this reduction in premedication use. DISCUSSION: Although we did not reach our goal of a 50% reduction in inappropriate premedication use, opportunities for process improvements were uncovered and are being explored in the next cycle of this quality improvement project.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Humanos , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade , Ferro/uso terapêutico , Complexo Ferro-Dextran , Administração Intravenosa
17.
Pharmazie ; 78(8): 128-133, 2023 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37592421

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-allergic potentials of dactolisib, a dual PI3K/mTOR kinase inhibitor, on two important events for allergy: sensitization and the onset of anaphylactic symptoms. After sensitization with the antigen ovalbumin (OVA), five successive oral administrations of dactolisib effectively decreased serum anti-OVA antibody-an indicator of sensitization-levels in mice. In parallel with the antibody levels in their serum, anaphylactic rectal temperature decrease induced by the re-administration of OVA to dactolisib-treated mice was strongly diminished compared to that in vehicle-treated mice. The inhibitor also inhibited ex vivo splenic B cell activation indicated by the increase of phosphorylation of Akt, CD69 expression levels, and proliferation upon anti-B cell receptor antibody treatment, suggesting that suppressive effects of the inhibitor on B cell activation plays a role in its ability to decrease sensitization in vivo. We concurrently observed the anti-anaphylactic ability of dactolisib in vivoand in vitro. A single oral administration of the inhibitor attenuated the anaphylactic rectal temperature decrease induced in a mouse model of passive systemic anaphylaxis. In in vitro mast cell models, pretreatment with the drug inhibited the degranulation response and cytokine production in RBL2H3 cells triggered by IgE and antigens, without affecting cell viability. These results suggest that dactolisib, as well as other PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, might be a good candidate for anti-allergic drugs that exhibit both anti-sensitizing and anti-anaphylactic effects.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Antialérgicos , Animais , Camundongos , Inibidores de MTOR , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases , Mastócitos , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Antialérgicos/farmacologia , Ovalbumina
18.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 23(5): 370-375, 2023 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37527059

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this literature review was to review the latest use of biologics in the management of anaphylaxis. The methodology was to highlight both the nonbiologic management of anaphylaxis and the biologic management and how they can be used in conjunction with each other. RECENT FINDINGS: As the phenotypes and endotypes of anaphylaxis are better portrayed, it furthers our understanding of the mechanisms of anaphylaxis. New applications of existing biologics to the prevention of anaphylaxis are described. SUMMARY: Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening acute hypersensitivity reaction affecting up to 16.8% of the U.S. population. Acute management entails swift identification, removal of the causative agent, and the prevention of cardiovascular collapse, firstly with epinephrine. Adjunctive treatments such as antihistamines work to prevent anaphylaxis from recurring. Biologic management of anaphylaxis involves the use of large-molecule drugs such as monoclonal antibodies. Omalizumab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting unbound IgE, is the most prevalent and widely studied biologic in the prevention of anaphylaxis. Other monoclonal antibodies in development or approved for other indications, such as ligelizumab, quilizumab, MEDI4212, and dupilumab, may also have potential for preventing anaphylaxis through various mechanisms.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Produtos Biológicos , Humanos , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina E , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico
19.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 44(5): e22-e28, 2023 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37641226

RESUMO

Background: Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has been successfully used for decades to prevent graft versus host disease before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as a part of conditioning regimen. However, sometimes hypersensitivity reactions may limit its use. Objective: To evaluate hypersensitivity reactions experienced during rabbit-ATG infusion among children and present successful desensitization protocol. Methods: The medical records of pediatric patients who were given rabbit-ATG treatment at our tertiary center hospital HSCT unit between 2019 and 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Diagnosis of the patients, age at the time of HSCT, gender, presence of hypersensitivity reaction to rabbit-ATG, and management were evaluated. Characteristics of the reaction and presence of hypersensitivity reaction to other drugs were also noted. If performed, desensitization protocols were evaluated retrospectively. Results: We evaluated 81 patients; 66.6% of them (n = 54) were boys. The mean age of the patients was 8.78 ± 5.48 years. Hypersensitivity to rabbit-ATG was seen in six patients (7.4%). Four of them (4.9%) had anaphylaxis; two (2.4%) had urticaria. Intradermal test performed to every patient before the first dose of ATG infusion was detected a positive result in 1 patient (1.2%) . None of these seven patients had allergic reactions to other drugs before. Successful ATG desensitization was performed in five patients by using a 12-16 step protocol due to patients' reaction severity. Conclusion: This study aimed to evaluate hypersensitivity reactions with rabbit-ATG in children. A successful desensitization protocol with rabbit-ATG is presented. Desensitization must be performed with an experienced team very carefully in the absence of alternative drug.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Urticária , Humanos , Soro Antilinfocitário/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Testes Intradérmicos
20.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 43(3): 491-501, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37394255

RESUMO

Food allergies are a common and serious cause of illness, accounting for an increasing number of emergency department visits annually. Although definite diagnosis lays outside of an emergency department visit, the clinical management of the most serious food allergies highlights emergency care. The staple of acute care remains epinephrine in association with antihistamines and steroids. The greatest threat remains undertreatment for this group of disorders and underutilization of epinephrine. Those who have been treated for a food allergy need a follow-up allergist evaluation, guidance of food avoidance, and avoidance of foods with cross-sensitivities as well as ready access to epinephrine.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Humanos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Alimentos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...